|
|
Adelphi Charter
on creativity,
innovation and
intellectual property
Humanity's capacity to generate new ideas and knowledge is its greatest
asset. It is the source of art, science, innovation and economic development.
Without it, individuals and societies stagnate.
This creative imagination requires access to the ideas, learning and
culture of others, past and present.
Human rights call on us to ensure that everyone can create, access,
use and share information and knowledge, enabling individuals, communities
and societies to achieve their full potential.
Creativity and investment should be recognised and rewarded. The purpose
of intellectual property law (such as copyright and patents) should be,
now as it was in the past, to ensure both the sharing of knowledge and
the rewarding of innovation.
The expansion in the law’s breadth, scope and term over the last
30 years has resulted in an intellectual property regime which is radically
out of line with modern technological, economic and social trends. This
threatens the chain of creativity and innovation on which we and future
generations depend.
We call upon governments and the international community to adopt
these principles.
- Laws regulating intellectual property must serve
as means of achieving creative, social and economic ends and not as
ends in themselves.
- These laws and regulations must serve, and never
overturn, the basic human rights to health, education, employment and
cultural life.
- The public interest requires a balance between
the public domain and private rights. It also requires a balance between
the free competition that is essential for economic vitality and the
monopoly rights granted by intellectual property laws.
- Intellectual property protection must not be extended
to abstract ideas, facts or data.
- Patents must not be extended over mathematical
models, scientific theories, computer code, methods for teaching, business
processes, methods of medical diagnosis, therapy or surgery.
- Copyright and patents must be limited in time and
their terms must not extend beyond what is proportionate and necessary.
- Government must facilitate a wide range of policies
to stimulate access and innovation, including non-proprietary models
such as open source software licensing and open access to scientific
literature.
- Intellectual property laws must take account of
developing countries' social and economic circumstances.
- In making decisions about intellectual property
law, governments should adhere to these rules:
* There must be an automatic presumption against creating new areas
of intellectual property protection, extending existing privileges or
extending the duration of rights.
* The burden of proof in such cases must lie on the advocates of change.
* Change must be allowed only if a rigorous analysis clearly demonstrates
that it will promote people's basic rights and economic well-being.
* Throughout, there should be wide public consultation and a comprehensive,
objective and transparent assessment of public benefits and detriments.
We call upon governments and the international community to adopt
these principles.
[top]
|
|